Living labs, camino para la innovación del sector agro: un análisis bibliométrico
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
El sector agro es fundamental en el desarrollo económico de las naciones al proporcionar sustento y bienestar a la sociedad en general. Sin embargo, la falta de articulación entre las diferentes partes interesadas
como la academia, el gobierno y la empresa ha llevado a este importante renglón de la economía a realizar escasos procesos de innovación que con lleve a la sostenibilidad empresarial. Para esto surge el concepto de
laboratorios vivientes por su expresión en inglés “Living lab” (LL), permitiendo la estructuración de los grupos de interés que
giran en torno al sector agro con el fin de implementar innovaciones en su proceso de negocio. Este trabajo tiene por objetivo realizar un análisis bibliométrico de 91 artículos con el fin de conocer las diferentes métodos
y tendencias de investigación que se relacionan con los términos Living lab y sector agro.
Los resultados presentan relación cercana de acuerdo con el análisis de co-ocurrencia de palabras claves entre Living lab y grupos de interés, sostenibilidad e innovación. Lo anterior brinda una ruta al sector objeto de
estudio de como las innovacion es generadas en los laboratorios vivientes pueden hacer más sostenibles a los agro-emprendedores.
Details de l'article
Rubrique
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Investigium Ire de http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ivestigium est sous licence Creativie Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Comment citer
Références
Afranaa Kwapong, N., & Ankrah, D. A. (2023).
Understanding innovation process within
an interactive social network: Empirical insights
from maize innovations in southern
Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://
doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2167390
Aka, K. G., & Enagogo, C. A. (2021). Collaborations
in innovation activities of rural SMEs:
a configurational analysis. Journal of Small
Business & Entrepreneurship, 1–25. https://
doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.2004072
Alexandrakis, J. (2021). Cycling towards sustainability:
The transformative potential of
urban design thinking in a sustainable living
lab. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary
Perspectives, 9, 100269. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100269
Amenta, L., Attademo, A., Remøy, H., Berruti,
G., Cerreta, M., Formato, E., Palestino, M. F.,
& Russo, M. (2019). Managing the Transition
towards Circular Metabolism: Living
Labs as a Co-Creation Approach. Urban Planning,
4(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/
up.v4i3.2170
Asim, Z., & Sorooshian, S. (2019). Exploring
the Role of Knowledge, Innovation and
Technology Management (KNIT) Capabilities
that Influence Research and Development.
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology,
Market, and Complexity, 5(2), 21. https://doi.
org/10.3390/joitmc5020021
Ballon, P., Van Hoed, M., & Schuurman, D.
(2018). The effectiveness of involving users
in digital innovation: Measuring the impact
of living labs. Telematics Informatics, 35(5),
1201–1214.
Cvar, N., Trilar, J., Kos, A., Volk, M., & Stojmenova
Duh, E. (2020). The Use of IoT
Technology in Smart Cities and Smart Villages:
Similarities, Differences, and Future
Prospects. Sensors, 20(14), 3897. https://doi.
org/10.3390/s20143897
Delina, L. L. (2020). A rural energy collaboratory:
Co-production in Thailand’s community
energy experiments. Journal of Environmental
Studies and Sciences, 10(1), 83–90.
Engels, F., Wentland, A., & Pfotenhauer, S. M.
(2019). Testing future societies? Developing
a framework for test beds and living labs
as instruments of innovation governance.
Research Policy, 48(9), 103826. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826
Fèche, R., Noûs, C., & Barataud, F. (2021).
Building a transformative initiative for a
territorialized agri-food system: constructing
a living-lab and confronting norms? A
case study from Mirecourt (Vosges, France).
Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 400–409. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.026Ferguson, R. S., & Lovell, S. T. (2014). Permaculture
for agroecology: design, movement,
practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy
for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 251–274.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6
Gamache, G., Anglade, J., Feche, R., Barataud,
F., Mignolet, C., & Coquil, X. (2020). Can living
labs offer a pathway to support local
agri-food sustainability transitions? Environmental
Innovation and Societal Transitions,
37, 93–107.
García-Llorente, M., Pérez-Ramírez, I., Sabán
de la Portilla, C., Haro, C., & Benito, A.
(2019a). Agroecological Strategies for Reactivating
the Agrarian Sector: The Case of
Agrolab in Madrid. Sustainability, 11(4), 1181.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041181
Giannouli, I., Tourkolias, C., Zuidema, C., Tasopoulou,
A., Blathra, S., Salemink, K., Gugerell,
K., Georgiou, P., Chalatsis, T., Christidou, C.,
Bellis, V., Vasiloglou, N., & Koutsomarkos,
N. (2018). A methodological approach for
holistic energy planning using the living
lab concept: the case of the prefecture
of Karditsa. European journal of environmental
sciences, 8(1), 14–22. https://doi.
org/10.14712/23361964.2018.3
Gutiérrez Cano, L. F., Zartha Sossa, J. W.,
Orozco Mendoza, G. L., Suárez Guzmán, L. M.,
Agudelo Tapasco, D. A., & Quintero Saavedra,
J. I. (2023). Agricultural innovation system:
analysis from the subsystems of R&D,
training, extension, and sustainability. Frontiers
in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176366
He, Y. (2023). Food security and agriculture
value-added: Do they asymmetrically matter
for Korean environmental sustainability?
Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1). https://doi.
org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2213525
Hosseini, S., Frank, L., Fridgen, G., & Heger,
S. (2018). Do not forget about smart towns:
How to bring customized digital innovation
to rural areas. Business & Information Systems
Engineering, 60, 243–257.
Hou, X. (2021). Analysis of the correlation
between agricultural innovation ecosystem
and economic growth. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,
Section B — Soil & Plant Science,
71(9), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080
/09064710.2021.1956580
Hughes, H., Foth, M., Dezuanni, M., Mallan, K.,
& Allan, C. (2018). Fostering digital participation
and communication through social
living labs: a qualitative case study from
regional Australia. Communication Research
and Practice, 4(2), 183–206. https://doi.org
/10.1080/22041451.2017.1287032
Krebs, J., & Bach, S. (2018). Permaculture—
Scientific Evidence of Principles for the
Agroecological Design of Farming Systems.
Sustainability, 10(9), 3218. https://doi.
org/10.3390/su10093218
Leminen, S. (2013). Coordination and participation
in living lab networks. Technology
Innovation Management Review, 3(11).
Leminen, S. (2015). Living labs as open innovation
networks-networks, roles and innovation
outcomes.
Lindberg, M., Wikberg Nilsson, Å., Segerstedt,
E., Hidman, E., Nilsson, K. L., Karlberg,
H., & Balogh, J. (2020). Co-creative place
innovation in an arctic town. Journal of
Place Management and Development, 13(4), 463. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-
02-2019-0009
Lovell, H., Hann, V., & Watson, P. (2018). Rural
laboratories and experiment at the fringes:
A case study of a smart grid on Bruny Island,
Australia. Energy Research & Social Science,
36, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
erss.2017.09.031
Lyons, T. S., Miller, S. R., & Mann, J. T. (2018).
A new role for land grant universities in the
rural innovation ecosystem? Journal of Regional
Analysis & Policy, 48(2), 3775.
Mamba, M. S. N., & Isabirye, N. (2015). A
Framework to Guide Development Through
ICTs in Rural Areas in South Africa. Information
Technology for Development, 21(1),
135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/026811
02.2013.874321
Mason-D’Croz, D., Sulser, T. B., Wiebe, K.,
Rosegrant, M. W., Lowder, S. K., Nin-Pratt, A.,
Willenbockel, D., Robinson, S., Zhu, T., Cenacchi,
N., Dunston, S., & Robertson, R. D.
(2019). Agricultural investments and hunger
in Africa modeling potential contributions
to SDG2 – Zero Hunger. World Development,
116, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.
2018.12.006
McPhee, C., Bancerz, M., Mambrini-Doudet,
M., Chrétien, F., Huyghe, C., & Gracia-Garza, J.
(2021). The Defining Characteristics of Agroecosystem
Living Labs. Sustainability, 13(4),
1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041718
Michán, L., & Muñoz-Velasco, I. (2013). Scientometrics
for the medical sciences: Definitions,
applications and perspectives. Investigación
En Educación Médica, 2(6), 100–106.
Pade-Khene, C., Palmer, R., & Kavhai, M.
(2010). A baseline study of a Dwesa rural
community for the Siyakhula Information
and Communication Technology
for Development project: understanding
the reality on the ground. Information Development,
26(4), 265–288. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0266666910385374
Plaisier, C., Sibomana, M., Van der Waal, J.,
Clercx, L., Van Wagenberg, C. P. A., & Dijkxhoorn,
Y. (2019). Approach for designing context-
specific, locally owned interventions
to reduce postharvest losses: Case study
on tomato value chains in Nigeria. Towards
Sustainable Global Food Systems, 86.
Schaffers, H., & Kulkki, S. (2007). Living labs,
An Open Innovation concept fostering rural
development. Asia-Pacific Tech Monitor, September
2007.
Schwittay, A. (2008). ‘A Living Lab.’ Science, Technology
and Society, 13(2), 175–209. https://
doi.org/10.1177/097172180801300202
Shahnum, S., & Shah, M. S. (2024). Assessing
the impact of agriculture value chains
on food and water environments in Meerut
District, India. Discover Sustainability, 5(1),
395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-
00561-3
Simon-Rojo, M. (2023). The role of ecosystem
services in the design of agroecological
transitions in Spain. Ecosystem Services, 61,
101531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.
2023.101531
Surie, G. (2017). Creating the innovation
ecosystem for renewable energy via social
entrepreneurship: Insights from India. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 121,184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.
2017.03.006
Vicente-Vicente, J. L., Borderieux, J., Martens,
K., González-Rosado, M., & Walthall,
B. (2023). Scaling agroecology for food system
transformation in metropolitan areas:
Agroecological characterization and role of
knowledge in community-supported agriculture
farms connected to a food hub in Berlin,
Germany. Agroecology and Sustainable Food
Systems, 47(6), 857–889. https://doi.org/10
.1080/21683565.2023.2187003
Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., &
Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for
sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe:
Towards a research agenda. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54.
Ylimartimo, A. (2018). Case study on Bioeconomy
Campus, Central Finland. Biofuels,
Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12(2), 177–186.